TRW KNOWLEDGE · LEGAL INFORMATION
Pass Over and Not Today in Bangladesh Courts
Pass Over and Not Today are routine docket-management responses in Bangladesh courts. They defer a hearing without final disposal but differ in formality, consequences and follow-up. This article explains how each term is used, practical implications for lawyers and clients, registry roles, and steps to protect case position and procedural rights.
Pass Over and Not Today in Bangladesh Courts: Usage, Consequences and Practical Guidance
Courts manage heavy daily cause lists and use shorthand statuses to allocate limited time, give priority and preserve orderly progress. Two commonly encountered statuses in Bangladesh practice are “Pass Over” (পাস ওভার) and the colloquial “Not Today.” Both indicate the court will not dispose of a matter on the listed day, yet they differ in usual practice, expected consequences and the follow-up actions lawyers and clients should take. This article explains those differences, offers practical steps to protect rights and priority, and sets out considerations that lawyers and clients can adopt when a matter is deferred. Where relevant, readers can consult procedural sources referenced by courts, including the Code of Civil Procedure and the Supreme Court rules, and institutional listings such as the /supreme-court-bangladesh-cause-list.Context and Purpose of Case-Listing Responses
Court registries prepare daily cause lists that reflect the order in which matters may be called. Courts must balance many competing priorities: urgent applications, long-running matters, judicial time limits, availability of counsel and parties, and statutory or constitutional timetables. In this environment a binary approach — hear or dismiss — would be impractical. Pass Over and Not Today are flexible mechanisms that allow the court to manage time without requiring immediate final action.How these terms arise in practice
In routine practice, a registrar or a judge may mark a matter as passed over on the printed cause list or make an oral notation in open court. Lawyers hear these notations frequently and must calibrate their responses. Good practice combines prompt communication with the registry, a clear record in court, and managed client expectations. For an overview of practice areas where case-listing issues matter — for example due diligence, dispute management and regulatory timelines — see the firm’s pages under /our-practices/ and /services/. Information about the firm and organisational structure is available at /our-firm/.Defining Pass Over (পাস ওভার)
What courts generally mean by Pass Over
Pass Over is typically used to indicate a deliberate deferment of a matter for later hearing without disposing of the cause or striking it from the list. When a court records a Pass Over, the matter remains live and retains its procedural character; it does not ordinarily require a fresh plaint, petition or re‑institution fee. The practical effect is to preserve the parties’ rights while acknowledging the court cannot reasonably deal with the matter at that sitting.Common reasons a court passes a matter over
Typical reasons include crowded court lists, a judge’s inability to allocate sufficient time, short adjournments linked to related matters, or a joint request by counsel for a short postponement. A Pass Over may also follow a formal application that the court grants for convenience. Although a Pass Over keeps the matter alive, counsel should treat it as a limited concession by the court rather than a permanent safeguard: repeated pass overs without substantive justification may draw critical judicial observation or corrective directions.Practical consequences and immediate steps after a Pass Over
After a Pass Over, counsel should confirm the notation in the record, obtain the new listing date if provided, and check for any registry directions about document filing or certification. It is prudent to communicate the court’s notation promptly to the client and to review the next steps with the client’s timetable in mind. While the matter usually retains existing priority, lawyers should monitor cause lists closely: the administrative order of hearings can change and the perceived priority may shift.Explaining Not Today
What practitioners mean by Not Today
“Not Today” is a colloquial phrase often used in courtrooms to signal that the court will not hear a particular matter on that sitting day. It is less formal than Pass Over and can encompass a range of outcomes, from a short deferral to removal from that day’s active roster with a rescheduling that may be substantially later. Not Today can be invoked informally by a judge’s oral direction or by registry annotation when the court prioritises urgent matters.Why a court might use Not Today instead of Pass Over
Not Today is often used when the court must triage an especially overloaded docket, when key parties or counsel are not prepared to proceed, or when procedural deficiencies require correction before the court will entertain the matter. Because Not Today can imply a longer postponement, counsel should be alert that the matter’s priority could be affected and that re-notification, compliance with registry directives or other procedural steps may be necessary.Risks associated with repeated Not Today entries
Repeated Not Today outcomes, particularly when caused by absence or non-compliance, can increase the risk that the court will impose directions, strike the matter from the cause list, or require a formal application to restore the case. To reduce such risks, counsel should maintain a clear record, follow registry directions, and proactively seek a formal adjournment order where appropriate.Comparing Pass Over and Not Today: Key practical distinctions
The functional distinction rests on formality and likely downstream effects. Pass Over is generally seen as a formal adjournment without a requirement for fresh filing and with the case remaining on the court’s active list. Not Today tends to be more informal, can lead to longer delays, and may require additional administrative steps to protect priority. Both statuses may be used in civil and criminal proceedings, although the precise impact depends on the rules that govern the jurisdiction and the particular court’s practice.Role of the Registry, Judges and Counsel
Registry responsibilities
Registries organise cause lists, record notations and implement the administrative consequences of Pass Over and Not Today entries. That includes updating printed or electronic lists and advising counsel of any change in listing. Registry officers are an important resource for procedural clarifications; however, they do not substitute for a judge’s direction. When in doubt, counsel should seek a formal order on the record.Judicial discretion and case management
Judges exercise broad discretion over daily scheduling and case management within the bounds of applicable rules. That discretion is exercised in light of competing public interests: the efficient use of court time, fairness between parties, and the timely administration of justice. Courts may, where necessary, issue binding directions or timetables to ensure a matter proceeds within a reasonable period.Counsel’s responsibilities
Lawyers are expected to appear prepared, to file necessary materials when ordered, and to make reasoned, documented applications if an adjournment is required. A formal, brief application supported by reasons is more likely to be accepted than a repeated informal request. Counsel should also maintain a contemporaneous file note of any oral directions and ensure that the court record reflects the reasons for an adjournment or a Pass Over.Practical checklist for hearings after a Pass Over or Not Today
- Confirm the court’s notation in the official record immediately after the hearing.
- Obtain the next listing date and any registry instructions in writing where possible.
- Notify the client of status, explain implications and set realistic expectations.
- File any required or supplementary documents promptly and in the form directed.
- Consider a formal adjournment application if the matter risks repeated deferrals.
- Monitor cause lists and registry notices for rescheduling or priority changes.
- Where dispute resolution alternatives are viable, consider options such as arbitration or mediation; see guidance under /leading-arbitration-lawyer.
Practical examples and scenario planning
Three typical scenarios illustrate differing approaches. First, where both parties agree the hearing should be deferred because essential evidence is not yet available, a joint application for Pass Over accompanied by a short affidavit or statement usually preserves goodwill with the court. Second, where one party is absent and offers no justification, the court may mark Not Today and later require an explanation before restoring the matter. Third, where systemic delay arises because of a congested cause list, registry guidance and the judge’s case management directions will determine the next steps and whether additional administrative requirements apply.In all scenarios, timing and clarity matter. A lawyer who secures a formal adjournment order or a clear registry notation places the client in a better position to protect priority and to plan for downstream actions, including settlement discussions or alternate dispute resolution. Parties or counsel who rely solely on informal assurances risk losing track of procedural consequences and the relative position of their case on future lists.Intersections with other practice areas and institutional listings
Case-listing status can have implications beyond the immediate hearing. For example, commercial matters with time-sensitive regulatory requirements may be affected if a hearing is delayed. When matters intersect with regulatory timetables, tax reviews, or foreign investment clearances, lawyers should coordinate with practice-area specialists. For transactional practice considerations consult our /foreign-direct-investment-lawyers and /financial-services-regulatory-lawyers pages, and for employment-related litigation see /employment-and-labor-lawyers.When matters appear before the highest courts or require attention to the printed roster, counsel should consult official cause lists and registry notices such as the /supreme-court-bangladesh-cause-list to confirm scheduling. Because the implications for commercial parties, regulatory timetables and corporate governance can be material, careful cross-team coordination often prevents unintended consequences.Recordkeeping and protecting client interests
Good recordkeeping reduces risk. Make court filings, applications and registry correspondence part of a central case file. Maintain a written chronology of listings, Pass Over and Not Today entries, and any reasons recorded on the hearing date. Document communications with the registry and obtain formal directions from the judge where possible. These steps help preserve client rights and make it easier to seek relief if a matter is improperly delayed or struck off the list.Brief legal-information disclaimer
The content of this article is for general legal information and practice guidance only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not substitute for tailored advice from a solicitor or counsel who has reviewed the relevant facts and applicable rules. Specific outcomes depend on official rules, the governing procedural code, judicial direction and individual circumstances.For broader context on TRW’s work across corporate transactions, M&A, competition, tax and court-practice matters, readers can explore TRW Law Firm, its practice areas, the firm’s legal services, and the appropriate route to contact the team. These resources provide general information and do not replace advice on a particular record, transaction, regulatory question or current legal position.FAQ
1. What is the immediate difference between Pass Over and Not Today?
Pass Over is generally a formal adjournment that keeps the matter active and preserves priority without fresh filing. Not Today is a less formal indication the court will not hear the matter that day and frequently results in a longer rescheduling process, possible administrative steps and, in some cases, a need to re-notify or comply with further registry directions.2. Will a Pass Over always preserve my priority on the cause list?
A Pass Over ordinarily preserves a matter’s active status and does not require a fresh filing. However, preservation of absolute priority can depend on the court’s practice, the nature of subsequent lists and any intervening orders. Counsel should confirm registry entries, obtain a formal notation where possible and monitor future listings to ensure priority is maintained.3. If my matter is marked Not Today repeatedly, what remedies are available?
Repeated deferrals increase the risk of directions from the court, which can include a requirement to show cause why the matter should remain listed, or an order to take steps to prosecute or defend the case. Remedies include making a reasoned application for a fixed timetable, seeking expedited listing where appropriate, or applying to restore the matter if it is struck off. Specific remedies should be discussed with counsel in light of case facts and applicable rules.4. Do I need to pay a fee after a Pass Over or Not Today?
Typically, a Pass Over does not attract a fresh filing fee because the cause remains live. Not Today may sometimes lead to administrative steps that incur fees, depending on the court’s directions and whether re-notification or fresh filing becomes necessary. Counsel should check registry practice and the relevant procedural code for any fee implications.5. How should lawyers communicate with clients about Pass Over and Not Today?
Lawyers should explain that both terms denote deferral rather than final adverse decision, describe expected next steps, set a timeline for follow-up actions and advise on any risk of priority loss. Clear instructions to the client about attendance, document readiness and the importance of timely responses reduce the chance of repeated deferrals. Use of a written update after the hearing and an explicit plan for the next listing date are recommended.6. Where can I find official procedural rules that relate to adjournments and case listings?
Official procedural rules that shape adjournment, listing and case management practice include sections of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Supreme Court rules. Practitioners should consult the applicable statutory and court rule sources and the official cause lists maintained by courts; in the context of the highest court, consult the /supreme-court-bangladesh-cause-list for up-to-date listings and registry notices.7. Can alternative dispute resolution reduce the risk of repeated deferrals?
Yes. For many commercial or domestic disputes, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) such as arbitration or mediation can mitigate the uncertainty of congested court schedules. ADR options should be evaluated against case-specific factors, including enforceability, costs, and regulatory interfaces. For arbitration-related guidance see our /leading-arbitration-lawyer page.Concluding observations
Pass Over and Not Today are practical tools courts use to manage finite hearing time and competing priorities. Lawyers and clients who understand the functional differences, who keep clear records and who take prompt steps after a deferral are better placed to protect priority and to keep cases moving. When deferrals risk material prejudice to rights or commercial timetables, counsel should consider formal applications to the court or alternate dispute-resolution pathways. For organisational information and how these matters intersect with wider services, the firm pages at /our-firm/ and /services/ provide further context, while the range of practice pages under /our-practices/ offer practice-specific guidance. For direct enquiries regarding professional engagement, use /contact/.CONTINUE EXPLORINGConnected
Connected
legal insight.
Let’s discuss
the detail.
For a focused conversation with TRW, book a consultation or contact the firm directly.Book consultation →info@trw.org